Track3D Guide
No Pity Party
At some point in a long enough ultra, there is a pretty good chance you are going to feel sorry for yourself.
You are tired, Your feet hurt, You are sick of eating, The climb in front of you looks ridiculous, The next checkpoint feels much further away than it did on the Race Plan and you are starting to question some of the life choices that got you here.
That is normal.
I do not think the answer is pretending everything is fine or trying to convince yourself that you are having a wonderful time when you clearly are not.
My rule is much simpler.
You are allowed to feel sorry for yourself for five minutes.
Acknowledge how you feel. Let yourself be miserable for a few minutes if that is where you are.
Then the pity party is over and it is time to solve the problem.
The five minutes is my personal rule. It is not a scientifically established threshold and there is no research saying minute six is where your brain suddenly becomes useful again.
What matters is the change in question.
Stop asking: “How bad do I feel?”
Start asking: “What is actually wrong, and what can I do about it?”
The five minute rule
There are times in an ultra when everything feels unfair.
The weather is worse than expected, The food you packed tastes disgusting, You have been climbing forever, Everyone around you looks better than you feel, You are behind the schedule you spent weeks building and the next section suddenly looks impossible.
My response is not to tell myself those feelings are wrong.
If it is miserable, it is miserable.
Give it five minutes.
Complain internally, Swear at the hill, Be disappointed, Admit that you are exhausted and Acknowledge that right now you would quite happily sit down and never move again.
Then draw a line under it.
Pity party over. What is the problem?
That shift matters because feeling miserable and having an unsolvable problem are not the same thing.
A bad patch may be coming from hunger, dehydration, heat, cold, sore feet, poor pacing, sleepiness, a stomach problem, an equipment issue, disappointment about your time goal, or simply accumulated fatigue.
Those are different problems and they need different responses.
This is not fake positivity
I do not think there is much value in standing 120 kilometres into a race telling yourself everything is fantastic when your brain knows perfectly well that it is not.
Your brain says:
This is awful.
Fine.
You do not need to win an argument with it.
You can acknowledge the thought without letting it become the entire race.
“Yep. This sucks!”
“Now, what needs fixing?”
That is very different from suppressing emotion. It is also different from allowing the emotion to sit there in your head for the next three hours.
The point of No Pity Party is not to become emotionally bulletproof. It is to move from emotion into action.
Why low points feel so convincing
A long ultra gradually removes many of the things that make good decisions easy.
You become physically tired. You may be hungry, cold or hot. In longer races you may be sleep deprived. The original finish target can start slipping away. Small problems have had hours to become annoying and the remaining distance may still be enormous.
That is important because your perception of the problem changes with your state.
Research on endurance performance has repeatedly linked psychological factors with perception of effort, while ultramarathon research has shown that sleep loss and extreme exertion can impair reaction time and aspects of executive function. In other words, late in a race is not necessarily when your brain is doing its finest work.
That does not mean every negative thought is wrong.
It means a thought such as “I cannot possibly do another 50 kilometres” deserves the same treatment as every other race problem: examine it before you make a permanent decision from it.
“I do not want to keep going” and “I should not keep going” are different statements.
The first may be a temporary low point, the second may be a genuine safety or medical decision. Do not confuse either one for the other.
Pity party over. What is the problem?
Once the five minutes are up, I want to make the problem specific.
Not:
Everything is terrible.
Something useful:
I have stopped eating
Can I tolerate something different? Liquid calories? Savoury food? Smaller amounts more often?
I am cold
Do I have another layer? Gloves? Waterproof gear? Can I change wet clothing at the next checkpoint?
My feet hurt
Is there a hot spot, blister, debris, wet sock or shoe problem that can be dealt with now?
I went out too hard
Can I reduce the effort, walk the climbs, eat properly and let the race come back to me?
My time goal has gone
Is the race actually over, or has one version of the race ended? What is the next realistic goal?
I am overwhelmed by what is left
Stop racing the entire remaining distance. What is the next checkpoint, climb, turn or ten minute job?
This is where the mental side of an ultra becomes surprisingly practical.
You do not always need more motivation.
Sometimes you need calories.
Sometimes you need a jacket.
Sometimes you need to slow down.
Sometimes you need to stop staring at the finish line and get yourself to the next checkpoint.
Solve the smallest useful thing
When everything feels wrong, solving everything is a terrible target.
Choose the smallest action that improves the situation.
One of the biggest mistakes is expecting the solution to make you feel brilliant immediately.
You may eat and still feel terrible for twenty minutes. You may put a jacket on and still need time to warm up. You may slow down and still be tired because you have been running for eighteen hours.
The first test is not always “Do I feel good now?”
Sometimes it is simply “Is this getting less bad?”
Make the race smaller
There is very little value in trying to mentally carry the whole remaining race at once.
If you are 110 kilometres into a 100 miler and you feel awful, thinking about the remaining 50 kilometres can turn a difficult moment into something enormous.
So shrink it.
The next checkpoint.
The top of the climb.
The next hour.
The next gel.
The next time you see your crew.
The next ten minutes.
Ultramarathon specific research has repeatedly found runners using small goals and race segmentation as coping strategies. Popular ultrarunning writing arrives at the same place from experience: break a huge task into something your tired brain can actually deal with.
You do not need to finish the race right now.
You need to complete the next useful piece of it.
Useful self talk beats pretending
There is evidence that self talk can improve sporting and endurance performance, but I think the practical interpretation is often made too complicated.
Self talk does not have to sound inspirational.
I prefer it to be instructional.
| Not especially useful | More useful |
|---|---|
| Everything is great | Eat now, then reassess in twenty minutes |
| I am unbelievably tough | Walk this climb and keep the effort under control |
| I must finish no matter what | Get safely to the next checkpoint and review the situation |
| I cannot do another 50 km | I can get to the next aid station |
| My race is ruined | The original time goal is gone. What race can I run from here? |
The useful statement points toward an action.
That is why “Pity party over, What is the problem?” works for me. It is not trying to change how I feel. It is trying to change what I do next.
Plan the bad patch before the race
We spend a lot of time planning the physical race.
Pace, Nutrition, Hydration, Shoes, Drop bags, Lights, Crew, Checkpoints and Cutoffs.
It is probably worth having a plan for what you are going to do when your brain decides the whole thing was a terrible idea as well.
Before the race, think about the low points you have had before.
- What normally goes wrong first? Food, heat, cold, feet, sleepiness, pacing or mood?
- What has brought you back before? Food, caffeine, warmth, a slower pace, five quiet minutes, humour, company or simply moving again?
- What should your crew say when you arrive feeling sorry for yourself?
- What should they not say?
- Which decisions should wait until a fixable problem has been addressed?
- What are your non negotiable safety boundaries?
This is essentially an if then plan.
If I hit the low point, then I get five minutes.
After five minutes, I identify the problem and take one useful action.
Research into endurance psychology specifically recommends this kind of conditional planning because a strategy is much more useful when you have already thought about when to use it.
Where crew can help
A crew can be enormously useful because they are looking at the situation from outside your tired brain.
They can notice that you have stopped eating. They can see that you are shivering. They can remind you what happened the last time you felt this bad. They can simplify choices and solve practical problems while you sit there wondering why anybody invented ultramarathons.
But they need to know how you want to be helped.
My separate rule for crew is Never Quit in the Chair. The principle is closely related: do not make a permanent race decision from a temporary low before the obvious fixable problems have been dealt with.
No Pity Party adds the runner side of that conversation.
Give me five minutes to be miserable.
Then help me work out what we can fix.
Sometimes stopping is the right decision
No Pity Party is not a rule that says you must finish at any cost.
That would be stupid.
There is a difference between normal ultramarathon suffering and a situation where continuing is unsafe.
The five minute rule is for the ordinary low points of a long race. It is not permission to ignore a suspected serious injury, confusion, collapse, significant bleeding, severe heat or cold illness, serious breathing or chest symptoms, or advice from race medical staff. Race rules and medical advice come first.
There are also times when you can make a clear, rational decision that continuing is no longer the right choice even without a medical emergency.
The important part is that the decision comes after you have separated the actual situation from the emotional spiral around it.
No Pity Party does not mean never stop.
It means understand why you are stopping.
What the research says
The psychology of ultramarathon performance is still a developing research area, and the evidence is nowhere near strong enough to reduce success to a single trait called mental toughness.
A 2026 systematic review of 53 studies on long distance and ultra endurance runners found the clearest recurring association around maladaptive pain coping: it was linked with poorer pain adaptation and a lower likelihood of completing races. The same review found mixed results for mental toughness, resilience, self efficacy, motivation and other psychological traits, and warned that most of the available studies were observational and had methodological limitations.
That is useful because it moves the conversation away from the idea that some people simply possess more toughness.
How you respond to the problem may matter more than whether you can convince yourself you are tough.
In a prospective study of 204 runners in multi stage 250 km ultramarathons, runners used more adaptive than maladaptive pain coping strategies. Maladaptive coping was more common among nonfinishers, and each one point increase on the study's six point maladaptive coping scale was associated with roughly three times the odds of not finishing.
A qualitative study of runners attempting the Canadian Death Race found that athletes dealt with race stressors by making small goals, monitoring pace, nutrition and hydration, using social support and working through the mental and physical battle.
Broader endurance research also gives support to goal setting, imagery and self talk, while an expert endurance psychology paper recommends five practical strategies for moments when athletes want to slow down or stop: goal setting, motivational self talk, relaxation, distraction and pacing. Importantly, the same paper also says there are situations where resisting the urge to stop is not advisable because injury or environmental risk may make stopping the correct choice.
None of that proves my five minute rule.
It does support the thinking behind it:
Acknowledge the state you are in.
Do not let the state become the whole problem.
Use a practical strategy, act on what you can control and reassess.
The No Pity Party checklist
| Step | Question | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Feel it | How do I actually feel? | Give yourself the five minutes. No pretending. |
| 2. Check safety | Is this ordinary discomfort or something genuinely unsafe? | Use race medical support where needed. |
| 3. Name it | What is the actual problem? | Make it specific. |
| 4. Control it | What can I change right now? | Choose one useful action. |
| 5. Shrink it | What is the next manageable target? | Checkpoint, climb, landmark, ten minutes. |
| 6. Move | Can I safely keep progressing? | Start moving at the effort the situation allows. |
| 7. Reassess | Is the situation improving, stable or getting worse? | Adjust again rather than blindly sticking to the first fix. |
Common questions
Is five minutes the scientifically correct amount of time?
No. Five minutes is my personal rule, not a research established threshold. Its purpose is to put a boundary around the emotional part of the low point and create a deliberate transition into problem solving.
Does No Pity Party mean ignoring negative thoughts?
No. The first part of the rule is acknowledging them. The aim is not to suppress how you feel. It is to stop the feeling from becoming the only information you use to decide what happens next.
What if the problem cannot be fixed?
Not every problem disappears. Sometimes the useful action is reducing pace, changing the time goal, accepting discomfort, making the next target smaller or deciding that continuing is no longer sensible. Problem solving does not guarantee the answer will be “keep going”.
Should I use positive self talk?
Use self talk that helps you act. Motivational self talk can be useful, but instructional language can be just as valuable late in a race: eat, slow down, put the jacket on, walk the climb, get to the next checkpoint, reassess.
How can crew use the five minute rule?
Agree on it before race day. Let the runner have the few minutes they asked for, then calmly help identify the actual problem. Keep choices simple, deal with food, fluid, temperature, feet and equipment, and remember the safety boundary.
Does mental toughness predict who finishes an ultra?
The evidence is mixed. A 2020 study of 56 elite runners at the HURT100 found that mental toughness and self efficacy did not significantly predict race completion, time or placing. A 2026 systematic review also found heterogeneous results across psychological traits. That is one reason I prefer practical coping strategies over telling people to simply be tougher.
The final thought
You can plan the course, pace, checkpoints, cutoffs, nutrition, hydration, crew and gear.
You should.
But in a long enough race, there will probably be a point where none of that changes the fact that you feel completely miserable.
When it happens, I give myself five minutes.
I acknowledge it.
I am allowed to feel sorry for myself.
Then the five minutes are up.
Pity party over.
What is the problem?
Find the thing you can do next.
Then do that.
Plan the race. Plan the bad patch too.
Build the course, checkpoints, cutoffs and expected timing in Track3D Race Planner. Then decide what you want to do when the race stops looking anything like the plan.
Open Race PlannerRelated guides:
Never Quit in the Chair: Crewing an Ultra
Planning Your Ultramarathon Aid Station Strategy
How to Plan Your Race Day for a 100K or 100 Mile Ultramarathon
Research notes and sources
Research snapshot: 28 September 2026. The evidence base for ultramarathon psychology is growing but remains less mature than the physiological literature. The most recent systematic review found substantial methodological limitations across the field, so associations should not be presented as proof that a particular psychological trait causes better performance.
| Source | Why it matters here |
|---|---|
|
Song & Song, 2026 — Psychological traits associated with mental and performance resilience in long distance and ultra endurance runners |
Systematic review of 53 studies. Maladaptive pain coping showed the most consistent association with poorer adaptation and completion outcomes; evidence for mental toughness and related traits was mixed. |
|
Alschuler et al., 2020 — Pain coping strategies and performance in multistage ultramarathon runners |
Prospective field study of 204 runners linking greater maladaptive pain coping with higher noncompletion odds. |
|
Simpson et al., 2014 — Exploring Experiences of Running an Ultramarathon |
Ultramarathon specific qualitative study identifying small goals, pace and nutrition monitoring, social support and other coping strategies during the Canadian Death Race. |
|
Meijen et al., 2023 — Psychological strategies to resist slowing down or stopping during endurance activity |
Expert paper covering goal setting, motivational self talk, relaxation, distraction, pacing and if then planning, while also recognising situations where stopping is advisable. |
|
McCormick, Meijen & Marcora, 2015 — Psychological Determinants of Whole Body Endurance Performance |
Systematic review finding consistent support for imagery, self talk and goal setting, and evidence that mental fatigue can impair endurance performance. |
|
Hatzigeorgiadis et al., 2011 — Self Talk and Sports Performance: A Meta Analysis |
Meta analysis of 32 studies finding a moderate positive overall effect of self talk interventions on sporting performance. |
|
Brace, George & Lovell, 2020 — Mental toughness and self efficacy of elite ultra marathon runners |
HURT100 study in which mental toughness and self efficacy did not significantly predict completion, placing or finishing time. |
|
Guilherme et al., 2026 — The Role of Sleep on Physical and Cognitive Performance of Ultra Endurance Athletes |
Systematic review showing that sleep and sleep loss are relevant to cognitive performance in ultra endurance events, particularly attention and reaction time. |
|
iRunFar, 2024 — Miles and the Mind |
Popular ultrarunning discussion of present focus, segmentation and process goals in multi day events. |
|
Ultra Running Magazine — Work the Problem |
An experienced runner's practical framing of race problems as things to work through rather than immediate reasons to declare the day over. |

Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.