Track3D Guide
The Hidden Risks of Everyday Medication in Ultrarunning
At 110 kilometres into a 100 miler, a couple of painkillers can sound like a perfectly reasonable idea. Your legs hurt, you have been moving for most of a day, and the next checkpoint is still a long way away.
In everyday life, reaching for ibuprofen, paracetamol or a cold and flu tablet might barely warrant a second thought. During an ultramarathon, the situation is different. Heat, prolonged exertion, changes in kidney blood flow, an unhappy stomach, limited sleep and inconsistent food intake can all affect how your body handles medication.
That does not mean every tablet is dangerous, or that runners should abandon medically necessary treatment. It means the usual assumptions about familiar medicines deserve a closer look.
There are three different questions: is it permitted, does it help, and is it safe in the circumstances?
They do not always have the same answer. Some legal medicines carry important race-related risks, while some prohibited substances have little convincing evidence of a benefit over 100 miles.
This is a Track3D research guide based on a structured review of published studies and Australian medication and anti-doping information, not medical advice or a ranking of which painkiller to take. Where the studies disagree or do not answer a 24–48-hour question, we will say so.
The same medicine, a very different environment
A 100-mile race is not a normal day with a lot more walking. Exercise changes how blood is distributed, especially between working muscles, skin, the gut and the kidneys. Temperature, hydration, energy availability and the amount of time spent moving can change substantially between the first morning and the second night.
Then add the things that make ultrarunning an ultra: running downhill on tired legs, eating for hours when your stomach does not want food, keeping warm overnight and trying to make sensible decisions with very little sleep.
Kidneys
Fluid loss and prolonged exertion can affect kidney circulation and the interpretation of kidney blood tests.
Gut
Exercise and heat can disturb gut blood flow and tolerance of food, fluids and medication.
Temperature
Heat and exertion can alter cardiovascular demand and the consequences of stimulants.
Brain and sleep
Medication-related sedation or stimulation is superimposed on accumulating sleep deprivation.
Those are plausible mechanisms for additional risk, but the important qualifier is that a lot of medication research involves short cycling tests, healthy volunteers or ordinary clinical use. Very few studies examine repeated medication exposure during a continuous 30- to 40-hour mountain race.
The everyday medicine picture
These are not interchangeable products, and legal availability is not the same as sporting permission or medical suitability.
| Medicine or product | Why a runner might consider it | What deserves attention |
|---|---|---|
|
NSAIDs Ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac |
Pain and inflammation | Kidney circulation, gut effects, bleeding, potential sodium-related concerns |
|
Paracetamol Panadol and combination products |
Pain and fever | Liver toxicity if too much is taken, duplicate ingredients, uncertain endurance advantage |
|
Caffeine Coffee, gels, energy drinks |
Alertness and perceived effort | Cumulative exposure, sleep, anxiety, gut symptoms and individual tolerance |
| Cold and flu medicines | Congestion and other symptoms | Mixed ingredients, stimulants, drowsiness and possible anti-doping restrictions |
| Antihistamines and sleep medicines | Allergies or sleep | Sedation, impaired coordination and next-day effects |
| Prescription medicines | Legitimate medical treatment | Drug-specific effects, interactions and potentially conditional WADA rules |
NSAIDs: why a painkiller might create another problem
NSAIDs are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ibuprofen, naproxen and diclofenac are familiar examples. They reduce pain and inflammation partly by inhibiting enzymes involved in prostaglandin production.
Prostaglandins do more than contribute to discomfort. They can also help maintain blood flow through the kidneys when the circulation is under stress. During prolonged exercise, especially with heat or fluid loss, that protective role can become more important. Blocking it is one reason clinicians are cautious about NSAID use in endurance events.
There are also gastrointestinal concerns. NSAIDs can irritate and damage the digestive tract, and endurance exercise introduces its own gut stress.
A biological mechanism is a reason to investigate a risk, not proof that every runner taking an NSAID will develop kidney or gut damage.
NSAIDs are not generally prohibited by WADA. That does not make taking them during a race medically advisable. The current Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko medical guidance explicitly advises runners against their use.
What the ultramarathon ibuprofen trial actually found
In a 2017 randomised trial, researchers compared ibuprofen with placebo during an 80 km stage of multi-day ultramarathon events. Kidney outcomes were available for 89 participants.
| Group | Runners meeting the study's creatinine-defined AKI criteria |
|---|---|
| Ibuprofen | 22 of 42 (52%) |
| Placebo | 16 of 47 (34%) |
That is an observed difference of about 18 percentage points. It is concerning, but the statistical uncertainty was large: the published 95% confidence interval for the difference ranged from 4 points lower to 41 points higher with ibuprofen. The study did not establish a statistically conclusive increase under the conventional superiority test, nor did it establish the planned non-inferiority claim.
There is another distinction that matters. The outcome was defined using a change in a blood marker called creatinine, relative to an estimated baseline. Creatinine-defined acute kidney injury is a recognised research and clinical classification, but the trial did not demonstrate permanent kidney damage in those runners.
The study provides a credible reason for caution, not a precise prediction of what will happen to an individual runner.
It also does not demonstrate that ibuprofen improves finishing time or prevents the muscle soreness that arrives late in an ultra.
A 2024 scoping review covering 30 publications found mixed and methodologically limited evidence across kidney, electrolyte and other outcomes. A negative result in one observational study does not prove safety, just as one concerning trial does not settle every clinical question.
Gut injury and low sodium are separate questions
In a small controlled study of nine trained men, ibuprofen combined with brief cycling produced greater measured intestinal injury and permeability markers than exercise alone. Those measurements support concern about the gut barrier, but they are not the same as diagnosed gastrointestinal bleeding or a known risk of hospitalisation during a 100 miler.
There is also discussion about NSAIDs and exercise-associated hyponatraemia, where blood sodium becomes abnormally low. Studies disagree about the size or existence of a specific NSAID contribution, and some published figures require correction or further verification.
It is important not to confuse hyponatraemia with dehydration. Both can occur around endurance events, their symptoms can overlap, and the correct response is not always simply to drink more fluid.
The available research does not provide a reliable NSAID-specific hyponatraemia risk estimate for 24–48-hour ultramarathons. We have deliberately not used disputed numerical findings from studies whose correction notices or tables remain unresolved.
Paracetamol is not an NSAID, but it is not a free pass
Paracetamol (Panadol is a familiar Australian brand) relieves pain through different mechanisms from NSAIDs. It does not produce the same prostaglandin-related kidney effects as a typical NSAID, but that does not make it a universally safe substitute for race pain.
Excess paracetamol can cause serious liver injury. A less obvious risk is accidentally taking it twice: one product for pain and another cold and flu product may contain the same active ingredient. The TGA's practitioner information explains the clinical toxicity concerns.
Could pain relief help athletic performance? Some small cycling experiments found task-specific effects. However, a 2021 review of ten studies involving 141 participants found no significant overall endurance or time-trial improvement. Its time-to-exhaustion subgroup showed a positive finding, which is not the same as a demonstrated improvement in ultra race time.
We also do not have adequate evidence that repeated therapeutic paracetamol use during a 30-hour race is harmless under all nutritional and medical circumstances. Severe clinical malnutrition has specific medical implications; skipping a few feeds during an ultra is not automatically the same condition.
Caffeine is a genuine performance enhancer, and it is permitted
Here is the interesting contrast. Caffeine has credible evidence for improving some endurance tasks and reducing perceived effort. The Australian Institute of Sport places caffeine among its Group A supplements, which have strong evidence for specific sporting applications.
Caffeine is also completely ordinary in ultrarunning: coffee before the start, caffeinated gels, cola at an aid station and perhaps an energy drink in the second night.
But those sources add up. Caffeine can also contribute to sleep difficulty, anxiety, a racing heartbeat or gastrointestinal discomfort, with considerable individual variation. A 2026 synthesis of acute side effects examined these concerns in athletes.
A separate body of sleep-deprivation research suggests caffeine can temporarily support some measures of vigilance. It does not restore a rested brain, and the relevant 48-hour experiments were not conducted while people were running technical trails.
Feeling more awake is not the same as being fully recovered or making better decisions.
And ordinary caffeine consumption should not automatically be described as dehydrating: controlled research in habitual coffee drinkers did not find a reduction in total body water compared with an equivalent amount of water.
There is no well-validated cumulative caffeine safety ceiling specifically for a 24–48-hour ultra that can be extracted from these studies.
Cold, flu and allergy tablets: check what is actually in the packet
Brand names are not enough. A cold and flu product might contain paracetamol, a decongestant, a sedating antihistamine, or a combination. Another product with a similar name may contain different ingredients.
Pseudoephedrine is a good example of why availability and anti-doping status must be considered separately. Some legitimate Australian pharmacy products contain it, yet WADA prohibits pseudoephedrine in competition above a specified urinary threshold. That is not proof of a meaningful endurance benefit, and the research on healthy-athlete performance is inconsistent.
Some older antihistamines, such as promethazine and doxylamine, can cause drowsiness and impaired coordination. Prescription sleep medicines may have additional next-day effects. None of those effects becomes less relevant because you are trying to navigate a rocky descent after a long night.
For an event using WADA rules, check the exact medicine through Sport Integrity Australia and Global DRO, including its ingredient, formulation and administration route. A legitimate prescription or pharmacist sale does not automatically provide anti-doping clearance.
Prescription treatment and performance enhancement are not the same thing
Asthma is a useful example. An inhaler can be medically important for someone with asthma, yet controlled studies in healthy people have not consistently demonstrated an endurance benefit from inhaled salbutamol. WADA has conditional allowances for certain inhaled beta-2 agonists, so both the medication and its route matter.
Systemic corticosteroids, including prednisone and prednisolone, can affect inflammation and physiology, and certain administration routes are prohibited in competition. Tramadol is prohibited in competition and, like other opioids, has important potential adverse effects. Neither observation means someone should stop prescribed or emergency treatment because they are entered in a race.
If you have a legitimate medical condition, medication decisions belong with your treating clinician. Anti-doping compliance is an additional question, not a substitute for medical care.
Questions worth settling before race day
There is no one medication rule that covers every runner, every prescription and every race. What is useful is removing ambiguity while you are still rested and capable of reading the small print.
- Know the active ingredients. Check combination products rather than relying on a brand name.
- Discuss existing medicines with a qualified clinician. Include relevant kidney, liver, heart, asthma or other medical history, and the expected duration of the event.
- Check interactions. Consider overlapping painkillers, multiple products containing paracetamol, stimulant combinations and sedating medicines.
- Check the actual event rules. Organiser medical recommendations, WADA classifications and individual Therapeutic Use Exemption requirements are different things.
- Do not assume a good training response settles ultra safety. A two-hour training run does not replicate a second night on the course.
- Know when to seek medical help. Severe or worsening symptoms, confusion, collapse, persistent vomiting, markedly reduced urine output or other unusual illness are not problems to mask with another tablet.
This checklist is not a dosing strategy or an individual treatment plan. Seek medical assessment when symptoms suggest illness or injury, and follow race medical instructions where appropriate.
What the research still cannot tell us
There are credible studies involving ultramarathon runners, but much of the wider evidence comes from cycling time trials, laboratory heat experiments, small crossover studies or clinical medicine. The same study can report a measurable change in a blood marker without demonstrating a difference in illness, hospitalisation or finishing time.
Our review also found reporting inconsistencies in some published tables, incomplete access to certain original papers and important questions about repeated exposure over 24–48 hours. Rather than fill those gaps with assumptions, we have kept the uncertain findings qualified or excluded disputed numerical claims.
We cannot derive a universal injury rate, a ranking of the safest race painkillers, or a reliable individual risk prediction from the available evidence. The gaps are even larger for runners with existing medical conditions, different ages, different medication combinations and very long exposure to heat, altitude or sleep deprivation.
The goal is not to frighten runners away from medicine. It is to stop familiar packaging from being mistaken for a guarantee of safety.
What a substance does in your body, what it does for athletic performance and whether it is permitted under race rules are three questions worth asking separately.
Common questions
Are ibuprofen and other NSAIDs banned by WADA?
They are generally permitted under WADA rules, but permitted is not the same as medically advisable. An event may issue specific medical guidance, and product combinations must be checked individually.
Does the ibuprofen study prove kidney failure in half the runners?
No. It measured creatinine-defined acute kidney injury at the finish of an 80 km stage. It did not demonstrate permanent kidney failure, and the between-group risk estimate was imprecise.
Is paracetamol a safer replacement during an ultra?
The medicines have different mechanisms and risks. This research does not establish a universally safer race painkiller or justify swapping medication without clinical advice.
Is caffeine banned?
Caffeine is permitted under the 2026 WADA list and appears in WADA's Monitoring Program, which is not itself a prohibition. That does not mean unlimited use is harmless.
What if I need prescription medicine to compete safely?
Continue managing the underlying condition with your clinician. Check the relevant anti-doping and Therapeutic Use Exemption rules separately; do not independently stop prescribed treatment to comply with a generic article.
Related Track3D Guides: When Your Stomach Stops Cooperating in an Ultra and How to Plan Your Race Day for a 100K or 100 Mile Ultramarathon.
Plan for the race you are actually going to run.
Track3D Race Planner helps organise the course, checkpoints, cutoffs and planned stops. It is not a tool for prescribing medication or assessing individual medical risk.
Open Track3D Race PlannerResearch notes and primary sources
Research snapshot: 12 October 2026. This article is an educational summary of a structured Track3D evidence review, not a formal systematic review, clinical advice, a medical safety clearance or an individual anti-doping ruling. Scientific findings and Australian sport rules may change. Where original full texts or corrections could not be verified, we have restricted or omitted the affected claims. Publication requires separate medical and regulatory review.
| Research source | What it contributes |
|---|---|
| Lipman et al., 2017 — Ibuprofen versus placebo in ultramarathons | Randomised field trial; creatinine-defined AKI group counts, uncertainty and design limitations. |
| 2024 — Scoping review of NSAIDs in marathon and ultraendurance running | Heterogeneous research and uncertainty about consistent clinical conclusions. |
| van Wijck et al., 2012 — Ibuprofen and exercise-related intestinal injury | Controlled small-sample evidence on gut injury and permeability markers. |
| 2007 — Ibuprofen and electrolytes in a 160 km run | Observational ultra findings that do not establish either safety or equivalence. |
| Grgic & Mikulic, 2021 — Paracetamol and endurance meta-analysis | Mixed task-specific effects and a nonsignificant overall result. |
| Therapeutic Goods Administration — Paracetamol practitioner information | Australian clinical information about toxicity and inadvertent excessive exposure. |
| Australian Institute of Sport — Group A supplements | Evidence-based classification of caffeine as a permitted ergogenic aid. |
| 2026 — Caffeine use in sport, side-effects systematic review | Acute adverse-effect evidence; not a 48-hour ultramarathon safety estimate. |
| 2018 — Salbutamol in healthy non-asthmatic participants | Bronchodilation without significant change in the measured aerobic-capacity outcome. |
| Sport Integrity Australia — Check Substances | Australian medication checks and the distinction between medical use and sport-specific restrictions. |
| WADA — 2026 Prohibited List and annual updates | Governing anti-doping framework, with route, threshold and in-competition distinctions. |
| Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko — Training & Medical | Current organiser advice on NSAIDs, separate from WADA prohibited-substance classification. |

Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.